The U.S. patent interference No. 105,229 (Davis vs. Saito) was declared on August 24, 2004 and closed on March 1, 2005 against the Intel U.S. patent No. 5,805,706 (application No. 08/633,581) that was re-issued later as U.S. patent No. RE40,694 (application No. 11/016,685) and is called as apparatus and method for re-encrypting data without unsecured exposure of its non-encrypted format.
Since Intel failed to overcome the U.S. patent interference and to validate the re-issue application by February 8, 2005, Intel decided to buy Saito's invention from Mitsubishi via IV's shell company i.e. Intarsia Software LLC (pages 63 and 64), but Mitsubishi avoided signing the assignment of patent rights for some reason and the Intel signed it illegally on February 8, 2005 to put out Saito's invention.
The documents are available in the USPTO image file wrappers of the application No. 08/633,581 (total 6 pages of 10-04-2010 e.g. the copy of letter to Intel) and the re-issue application No. 11/016,685 (total 65 pages of 09-07-2011 e.g. the same legal authority called corporate auditor was shared by both of Intel and Mitsubishi during and after the U.S. patent interference).
The signature on the assignment of patent rights was illegally made on February 8, 2005 by the Intel (as shown in the Intel custodian list - ”page No. 51 and item No. 925") instead of the Mitsubishi (as shown in the U.S. SEC report - "page No. 24") before Notary in Tokyo, and then the U.S. patent interference was illegally settled on March 1, 2005 before Board of USPTO, meaning that Mitsubishi has illegally played as part of Intel since February 8, 2005.
Hence, Intel and Mitsubishi need the signature of inventor-Saito to validate the assignment of patent rights dated February 8, 2005 filed in USPTO and to solve the long-standing patent frauds, but this matter can be solved between Intel and Saito without Mitsubishi because of the U.S. patent interference i.e. Davis v. Saito.
© Copyright 2017 Far East Engineering Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved